Monday 12 December 2016

Coursework Research - Dialogue continued

RESEARCH: DIALOGUE CONTINUED.

Dialogue:

Cinematic dialogue is oral speech between fictional characters. This distinguishes dialogue from other types of cinematic language such as voice-over narration, internal monologue, or documentary interviews, which have different characteristics. Writing realistic and effective dialogue is a laborious task. Most screenwriters need years of failed attempts and poorly written scripts to finally master the ideal chemistry that dialogues require to entice the audience and push the story forward.

I wanted to focus on dialogue and no dialogue scenes specifically in drama films because this is what we are thinking of doing for our coursework. 

Examples of dialogue scenes in drama films:

Dead Poets society is one of the seminal classics that is founded on great characters and fantastic dialogue, where more than a few inspirational quotes from Robin Williams are found everywhere. The dialogue, written by Tom Schulman, is clever, quick and classic, with the audience left inspired and moved as Williams' character teaches the students (and us) to learn to break out of their shells, pursue their dreams and seize the day.

As it follows Harvard undergrad and computer genius Mark Zuckerberg, the dialogue could be no less clever. In fact, Aaron Sorkin won the movie an Academy Award for Best Writing Adapted Screenplay, clearly proving why his writing is clearly at the top of the game. The dialogue is so dense and packed tight in everything he does that his scripts are 3 and 4 times longer than most. It's his belief that we don’t need to speak down to the audience that I like so very much.

Will Hunting, a janitor at M.I.T., has a gift for mathematics but needs help from a psychologist to find direction in his life. This clip shows some of the brilliantly clever dialogue that is conversed between Will and his peers, tutor and psychologist, throughout the movie. I think this develops the character, shows how clever he comes across on screen and without this, the character wouldn't be the same. 

What are the positive effects of dialogue in the examples?

There is really nothing compared to a well written and intriguing screenplay. Whether it be witty and fast-paced dialogue or intense and foreboding, the writing of a movie can really drive the character development and action. There are many positive effects of using conversation like to create a certain atmosphere or to portray thoughts. For example, it can be to express the feelings of the character, that would have been previously unknown. Dialogue can also have a positive effect on the viewer because a conversation or a speech can be creatively enhancing to the film and make the audience think. In the examples, dialogue helps us understand the characters more, in 'The Social Network' (in the clip above), the dialogue comes across as arrogant and therefore we can sense what kind of character he is. Or, the dialogue is used in sometimes a somewhat confusing yet clever and quick way to get the audience thinking. For instance, in one of 'Good Will Hunting's speech (again, in the clip above), I'm sure people can appreciate the lengthy monologue and the creative writing that, together with the performance, produces a brilliant scene.

What are the negatives effects in the examples?

However, there are some parts of dialogue that aren't particularly helpful or important as some instances in a film can impact the audience in a negative way. This can include occasions where the dialogue can become a little too clever, and complex and confusing conversations, that may seem clever but actually, nobody understands. A negative effect of dialogue in a film is that sometimes filmmakers, especially new up-and-coming ones, fall into a trap where they erroneously believe that dialogue alone is enough to provide enough excitement. However, this is not the case, as other mise-en-scene conditions are just as important. Therefore, dialogue doesn't have to be included just because it's there, but alternatively, it could make the film worse. Is often said amongst screenwriting that if the dialogue doesn't move the movie forward in any way, it should be taken out. Check out the confinement of the jury room of 12 Angry Men, where the actions, gestures, expressions, and objects are used to fill the void that dialogue couldn't.

What are the positive effects of no dialogue?


Using no dialogue in a film sometimes can create a film that just as exciting as a film with dialogue. It, therefore, means that the actions, gestures, expressions, and objects can play a much bigger part, as the audience are more likely to focus on these other mise-en-scene conditions more. I think that in the world of cinema, dialogue can sometimes be a hindrance and films may get bogged down in the foolish words spoken to each other, and meaning may be lost. No dialogue films can also remind us of films around the 1890s to 1920s, and all of them were completely silent, In silent films for entertainment, the dialogue is transmitted through muted gestures, mime and title cards which contain a written indication of the plot or key dialogue.

What are the negatives?

It is easy for no dialogue films to go wrong, and that's understandable, seeing too much over-expressive facial acting, too many contrived silent set-ups that obscure character development and motivation, as well as an over-emphatic soundtrack to fill in the gaps, can ruin a good plot. I think its a very fine line between reminding the audience of how minimalist a good film can become when dialogue isn't used, and when dialogue is needed to make the film so much better. Another negative of using no dialogue is simply to make certain the audience understand the film, not relying all the time on facial expressions to guess conversations. 

What issues do I think I would face in my own coursework by using dialogue?

When using dialogue in my own coursework, there could possibly be some issues. For instance, none of our group has ever written any screenplay or have experience with writing scripts and dialogue. This means it could take some time in figuring out how to plan, and then write the conversations, any other monologues or dialogue we want in our film. Becuase we've never done this before, it could be risky to include dialogue as it could come across as 'cheesy', 'ill-done' or too much. 

What issues do I think I would face in my own coursework by not using dialogue?

However, I think not using dialogue could cause just as many problems. For example, the audience could see that its an easy option out of using dialogue if we don't use it and we haven't at least tried. Perhaps not using dialogue could seem as if something is missing in the film. But, if all of the other mise-en-scene conditions went really well then we could pull having no dialogue off. I think it could be really effective depending on the plot to not use any dialogue, but it could be easier for us to use dialogue as it can explain more to the audience than expressions, and gestures can.

LR

No comments:

Post a Comment